• Welcome to Kart Racing Pro Official Forum. Please login or sign up.
 
April 23, 2024, 08:40:43 PM

News:

Please read the FORUM RULES


Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Raise

316
Off-Topic / Re: I has a question
February 16, 2017, 08:13:16 PM
Quote from: futureracer on February 16, 2017, 06:16:45 PM
Quote from: Raise on February 13, 2017, 07:43:49 AM
Quote from: futureracer on February 13, 2017, 07:07:54 AM
if you're just getting into karting i wouldn't recommened going under someones tent, it will cost you much more and you don't want to pay a lot when your just starting off

That's stupid any team worth the money provides driver coaching and tuning that goes well beyond what your dad knows from reading stuff on the internet. If you can afford to race under a team it does nothing but benefit you so I don't know what horrible experience you had to believe that they're bad.
no!!! i meant if your just getting into it, your not going to want to dump hundreds-thousands of dollars just for a weekend of getting used to it... but if your racing, having a team is a great, its the most fun ive had in karting

ahhh thats a good point
317
Track Requests / Re: Portuguese tracks request!
February 16, 2017, 09:09:29 AM
318
Other Addons / Re: OTK Chassis 2016 with M6 Bodywork
February 15, 2017, 09:48:20 PM
Quote from: Gillestheracer13 on February 15, 2017, 07:43:48 PM
Quote from: Raise on February 15, 2017, 07:39:44 PM
Quote from: Gillestheracer13 on February 15, 2017, 04:48:30 PM
Why did this project stop? @Raise please don't i'm asking the author not you ;)

i mean i know the author but if you dont want an answer then thats cool

You got me ;) Well if you still wanna tell me then sure LOL

Lucky you got an answer from lauzzzn cause there's no chance of me helping you now
319
Other Addons / Re: OTK Chassis 2016 with M6 Bodywork
February 15, 2017, 07:39:44 PM
Quote from: Gillestheracer13 on February 15, 2017, 04:48:30 PM
Why did this project stop? @Raise please don't i'm asking the author not you ;)

i mean i know the author but if you dont want an answer then thats cool
320
Off-Topic / Re: I has a question
February 13, 2017, 07:43:49 AM
Quote from: futureracer on February 13, 2017, 07:07:54 AM
if you're just getting into karting i wouldn't recommened going under someones tent, it will cost you much more and you don't want to pay a lot when your just starting off

That's stupid any team worth the money provides driver coaching and tuning that goes well beyond what your dad knows from reading stuff on the internet. If you can afford to race under a team it does nothing but benefit you so I don't know what horrible experience you had to believe that they're bad.
321
Off-Topic / Re: I has a question
February 12, 2017, 07:46:52 PM
call or email them and pay to run under their tent for the races you wish to compete. You'd need to talk to them directly about cost
322
Track Requests / Re: Bayford Meadows
February 04, 2017, 03:32:29 AM
Quote from: Sam Sanders on February 03, 2017, 08:56:53 PM
Can anyone make a version of Bayford Meadows? I have the first round of a championship there in about 3 weeks and some practice would be awesome!

Thanks,

Sam.

it takes more than 3 weeks to make a good track dude
323
Engines / Re: Rotax Max Evo Pack for Beta 15
February 02, 2017, 01:03:28 AM
Quote from: Gillestheracer13 on February 01, 2017, 11:00:56 PM
Quote from: Raise on February 01, 2017, 10:42:39 PM
Quote from: Marco Dakic on February 01, 2017, 05:58:18 PM
Quote from: Gillestheracer13 on February 01, 2017, 10:51:33 AM
Quote from: Raise on February 01, 2017, 01:42:45 AM
Quote from: kieranlong66 on January 31, 2017, 09:24:19 PM
I do not know why but around Genk the otk is 1 and a half seconds slower than the fp7 or lotus (on the same setup)

its mental i assure you there is nothing that suggests they would be be actually different at all

Instead of bullying us and checking the files, drive them and

I think this proves my theory, and no it's not a mental issue at all

If you check the files there are all the same, so its definetaly mental.

Or some other configuration you do on the track

I love that they argue it like its impossible for it to be mental. I checked the files the first time none of them were different and one dude agreeing with you means nothing as its not real evidence like looking at the files and seeing there is no difference what so ever.

Instead of giving me crap (again and again) drive them yourself and see the difference, which is definitely

how about instead of arguing and crying you accept that it is a mental thing (this is not an insult or a roast or a bad thing) not that there is something in the files because two very competent modders have just told you that there is no reason other than mental for a time difference
324
Engines / Re: Rotax Max Evo Pack for Beta 15
February 01, 2017, 10:42:39 PM
Quote from: Marco Dakic on February 01, 2017, 05:58:18 PM
Quote from: Gillestheracer13 on February 01, 2017, 10:51:33 AM
Quote from: Raise on February 01, 2017, 01:42:45 AM
Quote from: kieranlong66 on January 31, 2017, 09:24:19 PM
I do not know why but around Genk the otk is 1 and a half seconds slower than the fp7 or lotus (on the same setup)

its mental i assure you there is nothing that suggests they would be be actually different at all

I think this proves my theory, and no it's not a mental issue at all

If you check the files there are all the same, so its definetaly mental.

Or some other configuration you do on the track

I love that they argue it like its impossible for it to be mental. I checked the files the first time none of them were different and one dude agreeing with you means nothing as its not real evidence like looking at the files and seeing there is no difference what so ever.
325
Engines / Re: Rotax Max Evo Pack for Beta 15
February 01, 2017, 01:42:45 AM
Quote from: kieranlong66 on January 31, 2017, 09:24:19 PM
I do not know why but around Genk the otk is 1 and a half seconds slower than the fp7 or lotus (on the same setup)

its mental i assure you there is nothing that suggests they would be be actually different at all
326
Engines / Re: Rotax Max Evo Pack for Beta 15
January 31, 2017, 08:58:02 PM
Quote from: Gillestheracer13 on January 31, 2017, 11:32:29 AM
I'm in love with this mod, drove it a 1000 hours already (figure of speech) But i noticed something, Why is the Lotus Chassis so much faster on this engine then any other chassis? I can drive 49's easy on my first attempt on Lonato while i cant even do 50's with a OTK no matter how long i drive, and setup is 100% the same, can this be fixed?

probably all mental, just looked through the files both karts are set at the exact same weight in fact after checking all karts Junior Senior and Minimax all are set at 145 kg so that doesn't seem right
327
General Discussion / Re: AI Racing
January 21, 2017, 08:11:01 PM
Quote from: razorkart14 on January 21, 2017, 07:48:42 PM
I think its funny that street kart for IOS is coming along faster than KartKraft and KRP combined. Beta 12 was the best, just saying...

I dont know why that is, IOS game versus a game on PC not very comparable if you ask me
328
General Discussion / Re: AI Racing
January 21, 2017, 04:43:21 AM
Quote from: Minif1 on January 21, 2017, 04:32:16 AM
By the way, has KartKarft come out yet I've been waiting for ages aswel as everyone else has I guess tho

Google it dude this is getting off topic
329
General Discussion / Re: AI Racing
January 21, 2017, 02:38:10 AM
Quote from: PiBoSo on January 20, 2017, 11:36:51 PM
Quote from: Raise on January 20, 2017, 10:00:54 PM
That's so ridiculous I get that your game and the way your physics are made the karts can't be simulated for AI but the reason kartkraft does ai is because they use a better more advanced game engine then you. And I get that you yourself can't compete game engine wise with a full blown developer like the one that made kk's engine but to act like it's poor physics that make kk Ai possible is just a silly forced jab at the game.

Welcome back DRKarter  ;D
It was mostly meant as a silly forced jab at our resident KK fanboy that is still here despite the fact that he constantly mocks KRP whenever is possible  :-*


P.S.
Is English your native language? Damn your writing is bad!

No need to act like its a secret who runs this account anyone with any time spent on here when i was active would recognize it. I was on mobile and I hastily replied so yes there are mistakes. And he may have criticized KRP (with in reason I feel) he hasn't on here at least with in the last couple months (please link me if I'm wrong) and he also worked on the 505 and was/is doing things for WRS so why wouldn't he still be on here? Also your sense of humor was poorly conveyed as It was layered within a serious response but I suppose knowing you were joking I can see the humor in your statement.
330
General Discussion / Re: AI Racing
January 20, 2017, 10:00:54 PM
Quote from: PiBoSo on January 20, 2017, 04:58:27 PM
Quote from: Cory_Hayes on January 20, 2017, 02:08:29 PM
Basically I don't think it was ever initially considered by PiBoSo, they have basically said no, but I think some where said " never say never " or something about it.

A "never say never" message was posted indeed. It was just before tests started.
Sadly the tests proved the AI to be unfeasible for a simulator with accurate and complex physics.
Of course this will not be a problem for a well known pretend kart simulator with arcade "physics"  :P

That's so ridiculous I get that your game and the way your physics are made the karts can't be simulated for AI but the reason kartkraft does ai is because they use a better more advanced game engine then you. And I get that you yourself can't compete game engine wise with a full blown developer like the one that made kk's engine but to act like it's poor physics that make kk Ai possible is just a silly forced jab at the game.